Activity 4.1 – US Environmental History and Major Regulations
The history of environmental thought in the United States is a rich tapestry woven with various movements, ideologies, and influential figures that have shaped the nation's relationship with the environment. From early Native American beliefs of harmony to modern-day debates on climate change and sustainability, the evolution of environmental thinking in the US reflects changing attitudes, policies, and scientific discoveries. Before European colonization, indigenous tribes across the continent held profound connections with nature. Their beliefs emphasized the interdependence between humans and the natural world, viewing nature as sacred and deserving of respect. Practices such as sustainable land management and spiritual rituals underscored their harmonious coexistence with the environment. However, with the arrival of European settlers, a different approach to nature emerged. The Europeans did not have this same respect for nature. They abused the land and would soon realize the significant consequences of their inconsiderate behaviors. Jared Elliot, one of the first individuals with environmental concerns wrote about the need for better farming practices that do not destroy the fertility of the soil (Carman, Tugwell, & True, 1934).
In the 1800’s government institutions were created in order to help proper land management. Although these institutions mainly focused on farmland first they then began to expand to regulating forestry, timbering, waste from mining, and human disease. The Departments of the Interior, and Agriculture, the U.S. Forest Service, the Geological Survey, and the National Park Service were formed along with several major conservation societies like the Audubon Society, the Sierra Club, and the National Wildlife Federation (Theis, T., & Tomkin, J., 2018). Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote an essay entitled Nature discussing his views on the true essence of nature. (Theis, T., & Tomkin, J., 2018). He, like the early Native Americans, felt an enormous emotional connection to nature. This essay is what began the transcendental movement. The movement viewed nature as something beyond humans and showed how we should treat it respectfully. It discussed a new appreciation for nature and the liberation of the human mind from convention and formalism. Transcendentalism was diminished in the latter half of the 19th century, but it still had a far-reaching influence on our society and the influence humans have.
In the late 19th century, concerns about the environmental consequences of unchecked industrial growth began to surface. Figures like John Muir and Theodore Roosevelt played pivotal roles in initiating the conservation movement. Muir, the founder of the Sierra Club, advocated for the preservation of natural landscapes like Yosemite, while Roosevelt, as president, established national parks and forests, setting aside vast areas of land for conservation. In the early 1990's the modern environmental movement led to the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1970 and the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act. World wars had a major effect on conservation. They slowed it down tremendously due to a focus on the economy. Issues with our land were ignored as it became of less and less importance.
Throughout the latter half of the 20th century and into the 21st century, environmental thought has evolved to encompass broader issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and sustainable development. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the intersectionality between environmental issues and social justice. The history of environmental thought in the US reflects a journey from exploitation and disregard for nature to a more comprehensive understanding of humanity's interconnectedness with the environment.
Resources:
Andrews, R. N. L. (2006). Managing the environment, managing ourselves: A history of American environmental policy (2nd ed.). Yale University Press. https://nvclibrary.on.worldcat.org/oclc/858861836
Carman, H.J., Tugwell, R.G., & True, R.H. (Eds.). (1934). Essays upon eld husbandry in New England, and other papers, 1748-1762, by Jared Eliot. New York: Columbia University Press.
Russell, E., & Fairfax, S. K. (2014). Guide to U.S. Environmental Policy (Links to an external site.). CQ Press. https://nvcproxy.alamo.edu/login?url=https://search-ebscohost-com.nvcproxy.alamo.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=862170&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s4653251&authtype=ip&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_407
Theis, T., & Tomkin, J. (Eds). (2018). Sustainability: A comprehensive foundation. OpenStax CNX. THEISandTOMKIN_Sustainability-a-Comprehensive-Foundation-45.1.pdf
The Clean Air Act proposed cleaning the air of pollutants in 1970, but it was not until a couple of years later that Ott and Thom developed a Standardized Urban Air Quality Index (SUAQI), which was later called the Pollution Standardized Index (PSI) which was adopted in the United States as a uniform national air quality index starting in 1979, so it was necessary to create legal reforms to establish limits, the most current being the Paris agreement in which President Biden (along with 173 countries) committed to reducing CO2 emissions to zero as well as clean energy (solar and wind) by 2050, and with this fight against global warming and along with it creating bipartisan laws in energy, agriculture, transportation, and industry sectors and thus being able to have a better future for generations coming.
ReplyDeleteThis is a great change because global warming is already something that will not be able to stop but we can make it progress more slowly if we make the necessary changes, an example of this is the Paris agreement because everyone needs to work in unity to be able to make this project possible and thus improve our planet.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/climate/#:~:text=Reducing%20U.S.%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions,zero%20emissions%20economy%20by%202050
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAs briefly mentioned in your blog posting, the Clean Water Act was implemented in the 1970's in response to the industrial growth that was causing increased pollution in the United States. This act made it illegal to dump any pollutants into water sources such as rivers, lakes, streams, etc. This act has been updated as recently as September of this year and goes into effect this month on the 27th. The act still states its original principle that it is unlawful to release pollutants into navigable waters without a permit. However, it also elaborates on specific “adjacent” water sources that are protected under this act; that being water sources that may impact those same navigable waters as discussed above. I believe that the revisions made to the definition of water sources that quality to be protected under this act are necessary in order to ensure that more water sources are sustained and beneficial to the environment around it. However, I do think more initial protection of all water sources should be included in this act and be specified.
ReplyDeleteReferences
National Archives. “The Federal Register.” Federal Register :: Request Access, 8 Sept. 2023, www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/09/08/2023-18929/revised-definition-of-waters-of-the-united-states-conforming#:~:text=The%202023%20Rule%20incorporated%20the,flowing%20tributaries%20connected%20to%20traditional.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Final 2023 CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification Improvement Rule, 14 Nov. 2023, www.epa.gov/cwa-401/final-2023-cwa-section-401-water-quality-certification-improvement-rule.